On the second day of the trial on Tuesday, Harold McElhinny, a lawyer for Apple, said before a federal court in San Jose that the giant South Korean began to copy the iPhone since its public presentation in January 2007.
"The moment [the co-founder of Apple, Steve] Jobs introduced the iPhone, he warned his rivals that he had acquired over 200 patents for inventions [contained] in the iPhone," said the lawyer, according to Lusa.
"The Samsung had no choice. The Samsung could design their own models, Apple could hit the market equally. Or, you could copy Apple ... It is easier to copy than to innovate. "
Harold McElhinny also said on the second day of a trial that could last for three weeks, that 'the highest level of leadership, Samsung decided to copy all elements of the iPhone ", which" was not a fluke: a copy of the Samsung was intentional. "
Remember that a few weeks ago a British court ruled that Apple had to add ads to say that Samsung did not copy the iPad.
The indication is included in the judgment of Judge Colin Birss, who argued that the South Korean company had not copied the design of the Apple tablet Galaxy Tab because its not "paint was so" as the iPad.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário